No, Democrats Haven't Been Getting More Votes for Their Money Than Republicans
No, Democrats Haven't Been Getting More Votes for Their Money Than Republicans - Hallo World !!! News Today in World, In this article you read by title No, Democrats Haven't Been Getting More Votes for Their Money Than Republicans, We've prepared this article well so you can read and retrieve information on it. Hopefully the contents of the post
Article Salisbury News, What we write can you understand. Okay, happy reading.
Title : No, Democrats Haven't Been Getting More Votes for Their Money Than Republicans
link : No, Democrats Haven't Been Getting More Votes for Their Money Than Republicans
You are now reading the article No, Democrats Haven't Been Getting More Votes for Their Money Than Republicans With link address https://newstoday-ok.blogspot.com/2018/05/no-democrats-havent-been-getting-more.html
Title : No, Democrats Haven't Been Getting More Votes for Their Money Than Republicans
link : No, Democrats Haven't Been Getting More Votes for Their Money Than Republicans
news-today.world | FACTCHECK: Axios analysis omits campaign spending, which completely changes story
An Axios analysis of political spending in special elections that found Democrats to be spending far less per vote than Republicans did not include actual campaign spending, which is how Democrats have been spending most of their money. It dramatically alters the figures presented.
An Axios analysis of political spending in special elections that found Democrats to be spending far less per vote than Republicans did not include actual campaign spending, which is how Democrats have been spending most of their money. It dramatically alters the figures presented.
The Axios analysis, which was publishedWednesday morning and immediately showcased on MSNBC'sMorning Joe, was presented as a "big warning for Republicans" and as evidence of a coming "wave." It found that "Democrats got more votes for their money in every competitive special election since President Trump took office."
The results were striking. In Georgia's sixth district, for example, Axios found that Republicans spent $147.01 per vote for Karen Handel, which more than doubles the $62.37 Democrats spent per vote for Jon Ossoff, the loser in the race.
The one problem in the analysis was that Axios decided not to include campaign spending, where Handel's $5.8 million in spending was five times less than the $29.2 million spent by Ossoff, which accounted for about three quarters of the money spent on his behalf.
More
The results were striking. In Georgia's sixth district, for example, Axios found that Republicans spent $147.01 per vote for Karen Handel, which more than doubles the $62.37 Democrats spent per vote for Jon Ossoff, the loser in the race.
The one problem in the analysis was that Axios decided not to include campaign spending, where Handel's $5.8 million in spending was five times less than the $29.2 million spent by Ossoff, which accounted for about three quarters of the money spent on his behalf.
More
That's an article No, Democrats Haven't Been Getting More Votes for Their Money Than Republicans
Fine for article No, Democrats Haven't Been Getting More Votes for Their Money Than Republicans This time, hopefully can benefit for you all. Well, see you in other article postings.
You are now reading the article No, Democrats Haven't Been Getting More Votes for Their Money Than Republicans With link address https://newstoday-ok.blogspot.com/2018/05/no-democrats-havent-been-getting-more.html
