On Redistricting, Supreme Court Not Quite Ready to Change the Rules
On Redistricting, Supreme Court Not Quite Ready to Change the Rules - Hallo World !!! News Today in World, In this article you read by title On Redistricting, Supreme Court Not Quite Ready to Change the Rules, We've prepared this article well so you can read and retrieve information on it. Hopefully the contents of the post
Article Salisbury News, What we write can you understand. Okay, happy reading.
Title : On Redistricting, Supreme Court Not Quite Ready to Change the Rules
link : On Redistricting, Supreme Court Not Quite Ready to Change the Rules
You are now reading the article On Redistricting, Supreme Court Not Quite Ready to Change the Rules With link address https://newstoday-ok.blogspot.com/2018/03/on-redistricting-supreme-court-not.html
Title : On Redistricting, Supreme Court Not Quite Ready to Change the Rules
link : On Redistricting, Supreme Court Not Quite Ready to Change the Rules
news-today.world | The justices heard arguments on Wednesday in a Maryland case that could, for the first time, limit partisan gerrymandering. They didn't appear to have a consensus on how to address the problem.
Multiple courts around the country have determined this year that redistricting efforts can be so partisan that they violate the Constitution. The U.S. Supreme Court doesn't appear to be in a hurry to issue such a finding.
The court has now heard two partisan gerrymandering cases this term, with a third waiting in the wings. Although the first case, involving Assembly maps in Wisconsin, was heard in October, the court has yet to issue a ruling. The court heard an oral argument in the second case, which involves Maryland's congressional map, on Wednesday. The court may also consider North Carolina's congressional map.
The Maryland case, known as Benisek v. Lamone, turns on the question of whether Maryland's redistricting process, which eliminated the Republican advantage in one of the two congressional seats the party had controlled, violated the First Amendment rights of GOP voters who were being discriminated against because of their past voting history.
More
Multiple courts around the country have determined this year that redistricting efforts can be so partisan that they violate the Constitution. The U.S. Supreme Court doesn't appear to be in a hurry to issue such a finding.
The court has now heard two partisan gerrymandering cases this term, with a third waiting in the wings. Although the first case, involving Assembly maps in Wisconsin, was heard in October, the court has yet to issue a ruling. The court heard an oral argument in the second case, which involves Maryland's congressional map, on Wednesday. The court may also consider North Carolina's congressional map.
The Maryland case, known as Benisek v. Lamone, turns on the question of whether Maryland's redistricting process, which eliminated the Republican advantage in one of the two congressional seats the party had controlled, violated the First Amendment rights of GOP voters who were being discriminated against because of their past voting history.
More
That's an article On Redistricting, Supreme Court Not Quite Ready to Change the Rules
Fine for article On Redistricting, Supreme Court Not Quite Ready to Change the Rules This time, hopefully can benefit for you all. Well, see you in other article postings.
You are now reading the article On Redistricting, Supreme Court Not Quite Ready to Change the Rules With link address https://newstoday-ok.blogspot.com/2018/03/on-redistricting-supreme-court-not.html