Lawyers For The DNC Argue That 'Primary Rigging' Is Protected By The First Amendment
Lawyers For The DNC Argue That 'Primary Rigging' Is Protected By The First Amendment - Hallo World !!! News Today in World, In this article you read by title Lawyers For The DNC Argue That 'Primary Rigging' Is Protected By The First Amendment, We've prepared this article well so you can read and retrieve information on it. Hopefully the contents of the post
Article Salisbury News, What we write can you understand. Okay, happy reading.
Title : Lawyers For The DNC Argue That 'Primary Rigging' Is Protected By The First Amendment
link : Lawyers For The DNC Argue That 'Primary Rigging' Is Protected By The First Amendment
You are now reading the article Lawyers For The DNC Argue That 'Primary Rigging' Is Protected By The First Amendment With link address https://newstoday-ok.blogspot.com/2018/02/lawyers-for-dnc-argue-that-primary.html
Title : Lawyers For The DNC Argue That 'Primary Rigging' Is Protected By The First Amendment
link : Lawyers For The DNC Argue That 'Primary Rigging' Is Protected By The First Amendment
news-today.world | The ongoing litigation of the DNC Fraud Lawsuit and the appeal regarding its dismissal took a stunning turn yesterday. The defendants in the case, including the DNC and former DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, filed a response brief that left many observers of the case at a loss for words.
The document, provided by the law offices of the Attorneys for the Plaintiffs in the case, Jared and Elizabeth Beck, and appears to argue that if the Democratic Party did cheat Sanders in the 2016 Presidential primary race, then that action was protected under the first amendment. Twitter users were quick to respond to the brief, expressing outrage and disgust at the claims made by representatives of the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
The Defense counsel also argued that because of Jared Beck’s outspoken twitter posts, the plaintiffs were using the litigation process for political purposes: “For example, Plaintiffs’ counsel Jared Beck repeatedly refers to the DNC as “shi*bags” on Twitter and uses other degrading language in reference to Defendants.” Fascinatingly, no mention is made regarding the importance of First Amendment at this point in the document.
More
The document, provided by the law offices of the Attorneys for the Plaintiffs in the case, Jared and Elizabeth Beck, and appears to argue that if the Democratic Party did cheat Sanders in the 2016 Presidential primary race, then that action was protected under the first amendment. Twitter users were quick to respond to the brief, expressing outrage and disgust at the claims made by representatives of the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
The Defense counsel also argued that because of Jared Beck’s outspoken twitter posts, the plaintiffs were using the litigation process for political purposes: “For example, Plaintiffs’ counsel Jared Beck repeatedly refers to the DNC as “shi*bags” on Twitter and uses other degrading language in reference to Defendants.” Fascinatingly, no mention is made regarding the importance of First Amendment at this point in the document.
More
That's an article Lawyers For The DNC Argue That 'Primary Rigging' Is Protected By The First Amendment
Fine for article Lawyers For The DNC Argue That 'Primary Rigging' Is Protected By The First Amendment This time, hopefully can benefit for you all. Well, see you in other article postings.
You are now reading the article Lawyers For The DNC Argue That 'Primary Rigging' Is Protected By The First Amendment With link address https://newstoday-ok.blogspot.com/2018/02/lawyers-for-dnc-argue-that-primary.html