Bill Clinton: Should there be retroactive punitive action?
Bill Clinton: Should there be retroactive punitive action? - Hallo World !!! News Today in World, In this article you read by title Bill Clinton: Should there be retroactive punitive action?, We've prepared this article well so you can read and retrieve information on it. Hopefully the contents of the post
Article Salisbury News, What we write can you understand. Okay, happy reading.
Title : Bill Clinton: Should there be retroactive punitive action?
link : Bill Clinton: Should there be retroactive punitive action?
You are now reading the article Bill Clinton: Should there be retroactive punitive action? With link address https://newstoday-ok.blogspot.com/2017/11/bill-clinton-should-there-be.html
Title : Bill Clinton: Should there be retroactive punitive action?
link : Bill Clinton: Should there be retroactive punitive action?
news-today.world | As many of the sexual deviants are now being exposed throughout the media and now Congress sees this issue as a dire problem in need of legislature, should Bill Clinton be stripped of all benefits he and his wife receive as a result of his term as President of the United States?
Most should remember the fact that former presidents get all kinds of perks in their post-presidential life, including (but not limited to) Secret Service detail, a yearly salary and premium healthcare - all paid for by us, the taxpayers. Given that Clinton was impeached (only the second in US History) for lying about his tawdry affair with Monica Lewinsky, should he be forced to forfeit all the bennies he's been receiving for almost twenty years on our dime?
Why should we continue to pay for the Clintons' upkeep considering the fact that even Hillary Clinton - the supposed champion for women - ridiculed and threatened many of the women who turned out to be real victims at both hers and her husband's hand. She has claimed victims should be believed; however, since, several stories of how she terrorized these women have become tales of endurance by the women brave enough to come out and expose both Clintons' behaviors.
Clinton did eventually admit to his lies and his sexual predatory behaviors but being these crimes are long past their Statutory Limitations shelf date, nothing can be done legally to bring victims any remedy other than satisfaction that he no longer enjoys the lush life of post-presidential service. Should he have to pay back all the money he's received from this salary allotment including the costs for Secret Service and other presidential perks?
What do you feel should be done regarding the Clintons and the benefits they enjoy at our expense? Should they continue to live on our tax dollars or should those benefits be stripped and they be left to fend for themselves?
Most should remember the fact that former presidents get all kinds of perks in their post-presidential life, including (but not limited to) Secret Service detail, a yearly salary and premium healthcare - all paid for by us, the taxpayers. Given that Clinton was impeached (only the second in US History) for lying about his tawdry affair with Monica Lewinsky, should he be forced to forfeit all the bennies he's been receiving for almost twenty years on our dime?
Why should we continue to pay for the Clintons' upkeep considering the fact that even Hillary Clinton - the supposed champion for women - ridiculed and threatened many of the women who turned out to be real victims at both hers and her husband's hand. She has claimed victims should be believed; however, since, several stories of how she terrorized these women have become tales of endurance by the women brave enough to come out and expose both Clintons' behaviors.
Clinton did eventually admit to his lies and his sexual predatory behaviors but being these crimes are long past their Statutory Limitations shelf date, nothing can be done legally to bring victims any remedy other than satisfaction that he no longer enjoys the lush life of post-presidential service. Should he have to pay back all the money he's received from this salary allotment including the costs for Secret Service and other presidential perks?
What do you feel should be done regarding the Clintons and the benefits they enjoy at our expense? Should they continue to live on our tax dollars or should those benefits be stripped and they be left to fend for themselves?
That's an article Bill Clinton: Should there be retroactive punitive action?
Fine for article Bill Clinton: Should there be retroactive punitive action? This time, hopefully can benefit for you all. Well, see you in other article postings.
You are now reading the article Bill Clinton: Should there be retroactive punitive action? With link address https://newstoday-ok.blogspot.com/2017/11/bill-clinton-should-there-be.html