Delingpole: Man-Made Climate Catastrophe Is a Myth, More Studies Confirm
Delingpole: Man-Made Climate Catastrophe Is a Myth, More Studies Confirm - Hallo World !!! News Today in World, In this article you read by title Delingpole: Man-Made Climate Catastrophe Is a Myth, More Studies Confirm, We've prepared this article well so you can read and retrieve information on it. Hopefully the contents of the post
Article Salisbury News, What we write can you understand. Okay, happy reading.
Title : Delingpole: Man-Made Climate Catastrophe Is a Myth, More Studies Confirm
link : Delingpole: Man-Made Climate Catastrophe Is a Myth, More Studies Confirm
You are now reading the article Delingpole: Man-Made Climate Catastrophe Is a Myth, More Studies Confirm With link address https://newstoday-ok.blogspot.com/2017/10/delingpole-man-made-climate-catastrophe.html
Title : Delingpole: Man-Made Climate Catastrophe Is a Myth, More Studies Confirm
link : Delingpole: Man-Made Climate Catastrophe Is a Myth, More Studies Confirm
news-today.world | From the world of science – as opposed to grant-troughing junk science – two more studies confirming that the man-made global warming scare is a myth.
One, a study by Scafetta et al, published in International Journal of Heat and Technology, confirms that the “Pause” in global warming is real – and that “climate change” is much more likely the result of natural, cyclical fluctuations than man-made CO2 emissions.
Abstract
The period from 2000 to 2016 shows a modest warming trend that the advocates of the anthropogenic global warming theory have labeled as the “pause” or “hiatus.” These labels were chosen to indicate that the observed temperature standstill period results from an unforced internal fluctuation of the climate (e.g. by heat uptake of the deep ocean) that the computer climate models are claimed to occasionally reproduce without contradicting the anthropogenic global warming theory (AGWT) paradigm. In part 1 of this work, it was shown that the statistical analysis rejects such labels with a 95% confidence because the standstill period has lasted more than the 15 year period limit provided by the AGWT advocates themselves. Anyhow, the strong warming peak observed in 2015-2016, the “hottest year on record,” gave the impression that the temperature standstill stopped in 2014. Herein, the authors show that such a temperature peak is unrelated to anthropogenic forcing: it simply emerged from the natural fast fluctuations of the climate associated to the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) phenomenon. By removing the ENSO signature, the authors show that the temperature trend from 2000 to 2016 clearly diverges from the general circulation model (GCM) simulations. Thus, the GCMs models used to support the AGWT are very likely flawed. By contrast, the semi-empirical climate models proposed in 2011 and 2013 by Scafetta, which are based on a specific set of natural climatic oscillations believed to be astronomically induced plus a significantly reduced anthropogenic contribution, agree far better with the latest observations.
More
One, a study by Scafetta et al, published in International Journal of Heat and Technology, confirms that the “Pause” in global warming is real – and that “climate change” is much more likely the result of natural, cyclical fluctuations than man-made CO2 emissions.
Abstract
The period from 2000 to 2016 shows a modest warming trend that the advocates of the anthropogenic global warming theory have labeled as the “pause” or “hiatus.” These labels were chosen to indicate that the observed temperature standstill period results from an unforced internal fluctuation of the climate (e.g. by heat uptake of the deep ocean) that the computer climate models are claimed to occasionally reproduce without contradicting the anthropogenic global warming theory (AGWT) paradigm. In part 1 of this work, it was shown that the statistical analysis rejects such labels with a 95% confidence because the standstill period has lasted more than the 15 year period limit provided by the AGWT advocates themselves. Anyhow, the strong warming peak observed in 2015-2016, the “hottest year on record,” gave the impression that the temperature standstill stopped in 2014. Herein, the authors show that such a temperature peak is unrelated to anthropogenic forcing: it simply emerged from the natural fast fluctuations of the climate associated to the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) phenomenon. By removing the ENSO signature, the authors show that the temperature trend from 2000 to 2016 clearly diverges from the general circulation model (GCM) simulations. Thus, the GCMs models used to support the AGWT are very likely flawed. By contrast, the semi-empirical climate models proposed in 2011 and 2013 by Scafetta, which are based on a specific set of natural climatic oscillations believed to be astronomically induced plus a significantly reduced anthropogenic contribution, agree far better with the latest observations.
More
That's an article Delingpole: Man-Made Climate Catastrophe Is a Myth, More Studies Confirm
Fine for article Delingpole: Man-Made Climate Catastrophe Is a Myth, More Studies Confirm This time, hopefully can benefit for you all. Well, see you in other article postings.
You are now reading the article Delingpole: Man-Made Climate Catastrophe Is a Myth, More Studies Confirm With link address https://newstoday-ok.blogspot.com/2017/10/delingpole-man-made-climate-catastrophe.html