Why Some U.S. Ex-Spies Don't Buy the Russia Story
Why Some U.S. Ex-Spies Don't Buy the Russia Story - Hallo World !!! News Today in World, In this article you read by title Why Some U.S. Ex-Spies Don't Buy the Russia Story, We've prepared this article well so you can read and retrieve information on it. Hopefully the contents of the post
Article Salisbury News, What we write can you understand. Okay, happy reading.
Title : Why Some U.S. Ex-Spies Don't Buy the Russia Story
link : Why Some U.S. Ex-Spies Don't Buy the Russia Story
You are now reading the article Why Some U.S. Ex-Spies Don't Buy the Russia Story With link address https://newstoday-ok.blogspot.com/2017/08/why-some-us-ex-spies-dont-buy-russia.html
Title : Why Some U.S. Ex-Spies Don't Buy the Russia Story
link : Why Some U.S. Ex-Spies Don't Buy the Russia Story
news-today.world | Evidence that undermines the "election hack" narrative should get more attention.
In 2003, when a number of former intelligence professionals formed a group to protest the way intelligence was bent to accuse Iraq of producing weapons of mass destruction, New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof wrote a sympathetic column quoting the group's members. In 2017, you won't read about this same group's latest campaign in the big U.S. newspapers.
The Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) have been investigating the now conventional wisdom that last year's leaks of Democratic National Committee files were the result of Russian hacks. What they found instead is evidence to the contrary.
Unlike the "current and former intelligence officials" anonymously quoted in stories about the Trump-Russia scandal, VIPS members actually have names. But their findings and doubts are only being aired by non-mainstream publications that are easy to accuse of being channels for Russian disinformation. The Nation, Consortium News, ZeroHedge and other outlets have pointed to their findings that at least some of the DNC files were taken by an insider rather than by hackers, Russian or otherwise.
More
In 2003, when a number of former intelligence professionals formed a group to protest the way intelligence was bent to accuse Iraq of producing weapons of mass destruction, New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof wrote a sympathetic column quoting the group's members. In 2017, you won't read about this same group's latest campaign in the big U.S. newspapers.
The Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) have been investigating the now conventional wisdom that last year's leaks of Democratic National Committee files were the result of Russian hacks. What they found instead is evidence to the contrary.
Unlike the "current and former intelligence officials" anonymously quoted in stories about the Trump-Russia scandal, VIPS members actually have names. But their findings and doubts are only being aired by non-mainstream publications that are easy to accuse of being channels for Russian disinformation. The Nation, Consortium News, ZeroHedge and other outlets have pointed to their findings that at least some of the DNC files were taken by an insider rather than by hackers, Russian or otherwise.
More
That's an article Why Some U.S. Ex-Spies Don't Buy the Russia Story
Fine for article Why Some U.S. Ex-Spies Don't Buy the Russia Story This time, hopefully can benefit for you all. Well, see you in other article postings.
You are now reading the article Why Some U.S. Ex-Spies Don't Buy the Russia Story With link address https://newstoday-ok.blogspot.com/2017/08/why-some-us-ex-spies-dont-buy-russia.html