The Unexpected Reason Panhandling Bans Are Being Struck Down Across the Country
The Unexpected Reason Panhandling Bans Are Being Struck Down Across the Country - Hallo World !!! News Today in World, In this article you read by title The Unexpected Reason Panhandling Bans Are Being Struck Down Across the Country, We've prepared this article well so you can read and retrieve information on it. Hopefully the contents of the post
Article Salisbury News, What we write can you understand. Okay, happy reading.
Title : The Unexpected Reason Panhandling Bans Are Being Struck Down Across the Country
link : The Unexpected Reason Panhandling Bans Are Being Struck Down Across the Country
You are now reading the article The Unexpected Reason Panhandling Bans Are Being Struck Down Across the Country With link address https://newstoday-ok.blogspot.com/2017/08/the-unexpected-reason-panhandling-bans.html
Title : The Unexpected Reason Panhandling Bans Are Being Struck Down Across the Country
link : The Unexpected Reason Panhandling Bans Are Being Struck Down Across the Country
news-today.world | A Supreme Court ruling about regulating church signs is spurring cities to repeal their anti-begging laws.
In 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of churches' free speech. The case had nothing to do with panhandling, but it set a new legal precedent that's now being used to take down panhandling laws in cities across the country.
In Reed v. Town of Gilbert, Arizona, the court ruled that government regulations curtailing free speech have to be as narrow as possible and must fulfill a “compelling government interest.” At issue was a town ordinance that restricted where signs for religious services could be displayed. But the decision, which applies to any local rules that limit certain types of speech, has caught some cities by surprise.
"It's an unanticipated consequence," says Joshua Cox, chief counsel with the city attorney's office in Columbus, Ohio, where police recently announced they would stop enforcing a ban on aggressive panhandling. Cox remembers reading about the Reed case: “You don’t typically look at a graphics case and think, ‘I wonder if this affects our panhandling ordinance.’”
More
In 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of churches' free speech. The case had nothing to do with panhandling, but it set a new legal precedent that's now being used to take down panhandling laws in cities across the country.
In Reed v. Town of Gilbert, Arizona, the court ruled that government regulations curtailing free speech have to be as narrow as possible and must fulfill a “compelling government interest.” At issue was a town ordinance that restricted where signs for religious services could be displayed. But the decision, which applies to any local rules that limit certain types of speech, has caught some cities by surprise.
"It's an unanticipated consequence," says Joshua Cox, chief counsel with the city attorney's office in Columbus, Ohio, where police recently announced they would stop enforcing a ban on aggressive panhandling. Cox remembers reading about the Reed case: “You don’t typically look at a graphics case and think, ‘I wonder if this affects our panhandling ordinance.’”
More
That's an article The Unexpected Reason Panhandling Bans Are Being Struck Down Across the Country
Fine for article The Unexpected Reason Panhandling Bans Are Being Struck Down Across the Country This time, hopefully can benefit for you all. Well, see you in other article postings.
You are now reading the article The Unexpected Reason Panhandling Bans Are Being Struck Down Across the Country With link address https://newstoday-ok.blogspot.com/2017/08/the-unexpected-reason-panhandling-bans.html